I have something to say regarding drug laws.
Cocaine and opium (and opium derivatives) have obvious side effects, and this contributed to it’s legislation. But there is another factor that must be examined. A program by a man named Harry J. Anslinger whose outrages against cannabis were overtly and openly racist, was financed by the Herst Corporation. Cannabis and hemp products derived from it threatened the paper industry; so the public opinion was “altered” via racist and sensationalist propaganda, and later made into law via the “Marihuana Tax Act of 1937.”
Any undesirable side effects from cannabis use are, in light of this, rendered irrelevant when considering the real reasoning behind prohibition. Anti-cannabis laws have generated billions and billions in profits for corporations and law enforcement (the line between them having become indistinct). The only real reason why the legalization process is moving ahead is due to the potential of greater profits. Within the government / corporate world, different groups are fighting over the potential profits and losses from cannabis laws or their repeal: public health concerns are a mere pretext. The prison industrial complex stands to loose money, and the fledgling cannabis industries stand to make billions.
It’s as simple as that. We the People are barely on their radar as anything except potential customer base or livestock for corporate owned prisons.
It is a terrible mistake to assume that the laws against these drugs were enacted only for concern for public health. One must always assume two motives: racism and profit. The USA suffers from a racist mindset that spilled over from Europe, and became epidemic. We have not recovered from it; it still contaminates our thinking, and only an idiot would fail to see this.
The other is profit. An even greater stupidity would be required to believe that there is no concern on the part of law makers for profit and / or acquisition of political power. There is no depths to which most humans would refuse to sink if it promised an increase of power and wealth; and no government or corporate entity is truly trustworthy.
As far as the legislation itself, I offer food for thought. ALL this legislation, without a single exception, makes a serious error. NOT ONE of these laws actually does anything to address the urge within humans to get high. What makes a person wish to smoke a blunt, sniff cocaine, allow him / herself to become addicted to opiates, pickle their brains and livers with alcohol, and smoke industrial grade tobacco? What fuels this motive toward self ruin? And how is it possible to redirect that urge toward something socially and spiritually beneficial to humanity? The lawmakers have NO answer for this: and they NEVER will.
This, for no reason other than that the most spiritually and psychologically base and perverse people on the planet have laid their hands on the instruments of political, economic, industrial, and military power.
Put that in your bong and smoke it.